Showing posts with label Eric de Saventhem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric de Saventhem. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

FIUV Heroes (1): Elisabeth de Saventhem

 


We intend to start a series of laypeople who contributed a lot to the aims of the Traditional Latin Mass. We start with an article about Elisabeth de Saventhem who died 22 years ago this month. She was the wife of the first President of FIUV. The article was written some time after her death by the second President of FIUV, the late Michael Davies.


(We are most grateful to all those who contributed to the completion and translation of this text)


Elisabeth de Saventhem was born in Bremen in 1911 as the eldest of seven children, five daughters and two sons, to Walther Clemens, Reichsgraf von Plettenberg-Lenhausen and his wife, Carmen Guillermina.  Her spiritual formation was strongly influenced by an aunt, and her father's cousin was Blessèd Maria Droste zu Vischering of the Divine Heart, who had entered the Order of the Good Shepherd in Munster in 1885.

 

The economic crisis in Germany forced Elisabeth to give up her language studies (French and Russian) in Leipzig and she found work in an office in Berlin, quickly being promoted to senior secretary and purchasing manager (the company produced silk for parachutes).

 

The publication, in March 1937, of Pius XI's Encyclica Mit brennender Sorge saw the first public confrontations between the National-socialist regime and the Catholic Church.  Contrary to the concordat which had been signed four years before, the government forbade any distribution of the Pope's text.  Nevertheless it was copied and circulated by the Plettenberg family and Elisabeth's parents were arrested and imprisoned in Bremen, accused of "malicious gossip endangering the State".  Elisabeth, as eldest child, undertook successfully the defence of her parents before the minions of the Gestapo, so that they were released three weeks later.  The Gestapo in Berlin continued to keep an eye on this courageous daughter and shortly afterwards, following a series of anonymous letters accusing Elisabeth herself of spying, they tried to incriminate her - after more than 20 cross-examinations.  The efforts came to nothing of course, for the whole scandal had come from the unfounded, sickly jealousy of the wife of Elisabeth's employer.  The affair reached the highest levels of the Gestapo and came to a conclusion only in December 1938 with Elisabeth's brilliant rehabilitation by the regular courts.

 

During these years Elisabeth was much sought after in Berlin society.  She impressed those who met her not only by her beauty, her great intelligence, her natural charm and her "Catholic at its best" humour, but also because of her extraordinary ability to listen.  She understood especially how to recognise the problems lying deeper than the questions actually raised, and would then reply with great conceptual precision.  Behind this unusual ability lay a faith matured by interior struggles, paired with the fruit of superb religious teaching which Elisabeth had received at school from a gifted priest, Pastor Franz Moschner.  Later, at his request, she translated Moschner's most important book "Christliches Gebetsleben" into English.  The MS was published in 1962 as "Christian Prayer" by Herder Book Co in the USA.

 

Elisabeth's knowledge of doctrine and theology was so extensive and sound that her bishop authorised her to instruct and prepare converts for reception.  The time that she devoted to this instruction, and she had many pupils, was never less than a year.    She once remarked that although God had not blessed her with children of her own, she considered these converts to be her children.

 

The fact that Elisabeth  believed in God  as the "iustus iudex"  (the « just judge ») , to whom,  throughout her life, she would address the question of the meaning or unavoidability of suffering and death, lent to her own witness that convincing, many-layered depth which rendered silent every sceptic.

 

It was during the Berlin years that the momentous meeting with Isa Vermehren and her younger brother Eric took place, as they sought the Truth, which led to their conversions in 1938 and 1939 respectively.  Early in 1939 Elisabeth returned to Bremen to help look after her youngest brother and sister, and in March 1941 she became engaged to Eric Vermehren.  A few weeks later, Elisabeth's eldest brother was killed in Russia whilst carrying a badly-injured soldier from his company back to their trenches.  Elisabeth's parents persuaded the young couple not to wait until the year of mourning was over and so, in October 1941, they were married quietly in the presence of the closest family members, at Schloss Hovestadt, the Plettenberg family seat.

 

Because of a childhood injury, Eric was exempt from frontline service and served at first as a "Welfare Officer" in several camps for English and French prisoners of war.  In 1942 he was transferred to the Intelligence Service and sent to Istanbul as aide to the German military attaché there.  In this position he became aware, through freely available neutral reports, of the true extent of the dreadful deeds being done, especially in the occupied areas about which scarcely anything was known back in Germany.  This knowledge made him realise that, even as a subordinate,  his conscience would not allow him to serve the régime any longer.  During his first home leave in December 1943, Eric informed Elisabeth of his decision,  She was immediately ready to follow him into foreign exile.  In January 1944 they were "kidnapped" by the English Secret Services, in an action organised in the hope of protecting their families back in Germany.  English officers accompanied them via Izmir and Aleppo to Cairo and thence, via Gibraltar, to England.

 

The British Foreign Office had at that time adopted the Morgenthau-Plan.  Eric and Elisabeth tried, in many letters and interviews, to impress on the Foreign Office the advisability of allowing leading members of the inner German Opposition to help with the rebuilding of their ruined country, but to no avail.  They then asked that their status as "Guests of the Foreign Office" be annulled and they began to earn an independent living as assistant teachers in Worth Priory, a Benedictine preparatory school.  Elisabeth straightaway won the hearts of her pupils, despite, or perhaps precisely because of her original strictness in questions of discipline.   Among the anecdotes that she would relate of her time at Worth was that of finding one of her eight year old pupils crying bitterly one day.  She asked him the reason and he explained that it was because he liked her very much, so much in fact that he felt that she deserved to be English, and it was unfair that she was not.


For an "ex-enemy alien" it was well-nigh impossible to find a decent job in post-war England.  Eric founded a small export company  and Elisabeth helped in this effort despite her delicate health.  The early (unfortunately not long-lasting) success  of the company allowed them to leave Worth and move to the shadow of Brompton Oratory and a flat which was furnished with articles donated by friends.  Some five years passed before Eric found regular employment with a firm of Lloyds brokers.  He had by then adopted the surname Vermeeren de Saventhem, mainly for genealogical reasons.  In 1964 Eric became Director for Europe of the London firm.  The couple spent two years in Paris and in 1966 moved back to Switzerland, to settle in Clarens by Montreux.

 

From the moment that  Pope John XXIII's announced that he was con]vening a General Council of the Church,  all eyes were fixed upon that spectacular event - those of the de Saventhems with growing concern.  Elisabeth's religious life had always had its focus in Holy Mass which she attended daily with her husband.  In the accomplishment of the Sacrifice of the Mass she saw the definitive identity of the true Church of Christ and at the same time the reason for and the justification of the Catholic priesthood.  She knew - with all the Tradition of the Church - of the essential connexion between the Faith of the Church and its prayers:  as the Church prays, so it believes.  Thus it seemed to her presumptuous, nay dangerous, to question, even in Council, those forms of liturgy which have grown and proved themselves over the centuries.  The maintenance of the Mass as codified by St Pius V "with equal rights and equal honour" alongside any new forms became the main theme of her prayer, her thought and her actions, in close co-operation  with her husband, long-time President of the international Una Voce movement.

 

A first meeting with Monseigneur Lefebvre in Rome in 1962 sowed the seeds for over 25 years of cooperation, particularly vis-à-vis the Holy See.  This became intensified after the foundation of the Archbishop’s  International Seminary in Ecône, an hour's drive away from Clarens.  The Archbishop appreciated more than anything Elisabeth's ever acute sensus fidei et ecclesiae and her moral courage.  For over ten years the de Saventhems daily made the long drive from Clarens to Ecône to attend early Mass.  Later they were able to continue daily Mass attendance at a chapel in Lausanne and at the tiny Carmel of Marie Reine des Anges,  both served by priests from Ecône priests. The latter was situated on the slopes of the aptly-named Mont-Pèlerin just a short drive from home.

 

Elisabeth's life was filled with conscious and radiant gratitude towards the Church for the gift of faith.  It was however permanently overshadowed by a never-ending chain of physical suffering.  She accepted this with admirable discipline from her iron will which seemed to gain new strength at Mass each morning.

 

The end was not easy.  As the petals begin to curl inwards when a precious flower fades, so Elisabeth's mental elasticity, which had always been admired by all who met her, slowly diminished.  The interest was there, but ever more frequently the helpful replies did not  come.  Her physical frailty increased visibly, and for her  last journey from Switzerland to Bonn (the newly-chosen home, to be near the family again) a flying ambulance was necessary.  Elisabeth died a few weeks later in Cologne, in her sister's house, surrounded and comforted by the deep love of her husband and the devoted care of her sister and family. R.I.P.


Thursday, September 21, 2017

Leo Darroch's FIUV History: Una Voce

Image result for leo darroch

Note: The author is a great friend of Malta and he assisted Pro Tridentina (Malta) a lot during his FIUV Presidency.

Here is a unique contribution to modern Catholic literature. Leo Darroch presents in chronological order a factual history, fully referenced, of the work of the Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce, a movement of lay people formed after the sudden and insensitive enforcement of Novus Ordo Missae. It is the first fully documented account of the decades-long struggle for the preservation of the traditional rite of the Mass in the face of unrelenting opposition from the bishops of the Church.
The Right Honourable Lord Gill (Patron of the Latin Mass Society)

With his masterly present work, Leo Darroch, the former President of the FIUV, has given to the present and the future generations of Catholics a valuable documentation of the glorious history of the noble battle of intrepid lay faithful, who were committed to the restoration of the perennial liturgical sense of the Church. It was the battle of good sons and daughters for the honour and beauty of their mother, the Church. May the present book receive a wide diffusion and contribute in its readers a deeper appreciation of the perennial liturgical treasure of the Church, which is the classical Roman Rite.

Rt Rev. Athanasius Schneider, Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana

A renaissance will come: asceticism and adoration as the mainspring of direct total dedication to Christ will return. Confraternities of priests, vowed to celibacy and to an intense life of prayer and meditation will be formed. Religious will regroup themselves into houses of ‘strict observance’. A new form of ‘Liturgical Movement’ will come into being, led by young priests and attracting mainly young people… It is vitally important that these new priests and religious, these new young people
with ardent hearts, should find—if only in a corner of the rambling mansion of the Church—the treasure of a truly sacred liturgy still glowing softly in the night.

Dr Eric de Saventhem, Founding President of the International Federation Una Voce, speaking in New York in June 1970 at the first General Assembly of Una Voce in the United States.

Leo Darroch joined the Latin Mass Society in the 1970s, was elected to the Committee in 1986 and served for more than 25 years. He was deputy Chairman to Chris Inman for a few years in the 1990s, during which time he converted the old style LMS bulletins - which were A4 typed sheets - into the magazine format we now have and was the Editor until November 2000.

He was elected to the Council of the FIUV in 1999. He was appointed FIUV Secretary in 2001 under the presidency of Michael Davies, and served as President from 2007–2013. The book can be bought here.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

A Historical Interview from the first FIUV President

Interview granted by Mgr. Lefebvre to
Dr. Eric M. de Saventhem,
President of the International Federation Una Voce

Dr. de Saventhem: Excellency, it is known that you were in Rome on the 10th and 11th January for further discussions with Cardinal Seper, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Was it at Pope John Paul’s request that the Cardinal received you?

Mgr. Lefebvre: There has been some misunderstanding on this matter. It is true that an investigation has been in progress since January, 1978, and that it was to be continued by talks in Rome. Meanwhile, during the audience, the Holy Father, Pope John Paul II, assigned to Cardinal Seper, as to a trusted friend, the question of Ecône. It does not seem that he had in mind a procedure already in progress, hence the misunderstanding.

Dr. de Saventhem: Have you been interrogated?

Mgr. Lefebvre: Yes, twice, for three-hour periods. Seventeen series of questions by five interrogators accompanied by a secretary; but I was refused permission to bring even one witness.

Dr. de Saventhem: Early in January, a large circulation American magazine stated that, during the audience of the 18th November last, the Holy Father confronted you with an ultimatum: either you submitted to the Pope, or else you left the Church. Since then numerous papers have repeated the, burden of that report, as if your excommunication was imminent.

Mgr. Lefebvre: That is pure invention. The object of the discussions, I suppose, was to clarify the position with a view to finding a solution.

http://www.realnews247.com/marcel_lefebvre.jpgDr. de Saventhem: Nevertheless, the report that the Pope might soon lift the canonical sanctions imposed on you has not been confirmed. In fact, one wonders how the a divinis suspension could be lifted unless you agreed to refrain forever from ordaining seminarians without dimissorial letters.

Mgr. Lefebvre: This problem arises from the canonical status of our confraternity. The ordinations branded by some as "wildcat" had become necessary from the moment when the Secretariat of State, in a circular letter to all Episcopal Conferences, forbade diocesan bishops to incardinate our seminarians: and to give them dimissorial letters. This prohibition is an encroachment without precedent on one of the oldest episcopal prerogatives. Without it we would always have found resident bishops willing to regularize the canonical status of our young men. In order to solve this problem, it would be sufficient for our Society to be recognized as coming directly under pontifical authority.

Dr. de Saventhem: Would not such an official recognition imply that you had previously answered Pope Paul's priority request to you to declare publicly your sincere adherence to the Second Ecumenical Council of the Vatican and to all its texts?

Mgr. LefebvreIn reply to that request I had already written the following to Pope Paul VI: "I accept everything that, in the Council and its reforms, is in full agreement with Tradition." I have never been told why this declaration was considered inadequate; After all, a Catholic can adhere to the texts of a Council only in the light of the continuing constant teaching of the Church. That is a fundamental principle of the Catholic Faith, and my very clear impression is that, under Pope John Paul II, we shall see it confirmed; as much in the interpretation as in the application of conciliar texts.

Dr. de Saventhem: Did you discuss this matter with the Holy Father during your audience?

Mgr. Lefebvre: I am thinking rather about what he declared publicly in his very first message to the world after the election. Referring to the conciliar Magna Carta – the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church – the Pope said that it must be read in "the light of tradition," and that we must "integrate into it the dogmatic formulations laid down by the First Vatican Council." Only thus would the text become for all, priests and faithful, "the secret of an unerring orientation." If I were asked to declare my adherence to the conciliar texts "read in the light of tradition and integrated with the dogmatic formulations previously laid down by the Magisterium of the Church," I would sign without hesitation.

Dr. de Saventhem: Have you, in fact, signed a text of this nature, either before the audience with the Holy Father, or during your discussions with Cardinal Seper?

Mgr. Lefebvre: I can say that, in the course of the audience, the Pope accepted that declaration regarding the Council, and that it will be signed with Cardinal Seper at some time.

Dr. de Saventhem: Excellency, your confraternity now runs not only seminaries; but a dozen priories and two convents. All these institutions continue their liturgical life notwithstanding the rule of conduct promulgated by Pope Paul VI. Moreover, they refuse to conform with the "new orientations" adopted almost everywhere else. Even if Rome were willing to allow you to perform "the experiment of tradition," is there not a risk that, at diocesan government level, very serious problems would arise?

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lk598yBV7a1qaf7km.jpg

Mgr. Lefebvre: Let us begin with liturgical norms. They should, and could be made more flexible; that is the sole responsibility of the Holy See. With regard to the Mass, Pope Paul VI certainly never officially forbade the use of the Old Rite. Indeed, Mr. President, it was thanks to your wife that we have had oral confirmation of this from Cardinal Benelli himself.

* On the other hand, it is known that a good number of cardinals and bishops have expressed the desire to see the pre-conciliar rites re-admitted everywhere. Without doubt, there would be local problems, but there would also be the immense relief of numerous priests and faithful on recovering traditional rites and the devotion that accompanies them. Bishops would straightway experience the benefit to their dioceses. I dare to hope that the new Pope, in his pastoral solicitude, will not long delay this conciliatory gesture.                        

Dr. de Saventhem: There still remain the various post-conciliar "orientations" which Your Excellency has stigmatized as incompatible with the tradition and Magisterium of the Church and which your confraternity resolutely continues to oppose. Would you say that the claim that these orientations are derived from Vatican II is exaggerated?

Mgr. Lefebvre: It is true that in many fields – ecumenism: the institutions of the Church; liturgy; reform of seminaries and of religious life - the standards set by the Council have been left far behind. In their application, the new orientations have been used as a pretext for leaping into "creativity" and continuous evolution.

Dr. de Saventhem: There are nevertheless other new orientations manifestly favored by the Council. I am thinking especially of the so-called liturgical renewal.

Mgr. Lefebvre: I think I can state that all the novel orientations were favored by the spirit of the Council, as well as by the too often ambiguous written word. The liberal spirit of the Council, by its nature, leads to compromise with the spirit of man and of the modern world-which is in opposition to the Catholic spirit. That is especially the case in documents such as those on religious liberty; on the Church in the world and on non-Christian religions. Our fidelity to the Church prompts us to labor resolutely and patiently for a return to her great traditions. Our priories might be seen as beacons to mark our way on the long road ahead of us.

Dr. de Saventhem: Have you found, in your conversations with him, Cardinal Seper open to the ideas you have just expressed?

Mgr. Lefebvre: I value the Cardinal's sincerity very highly and I hope that he will seize the opportunity given to him by the Holy Father to manifest courageously the attachment which he certainly has for Tradition; but about which he has deemed it right, in obedience, to maintain silence during the last years. Millions of Catholics await with longing the application of religious freedom to the centuries-old tradition of the Church.

Dr. de Saventhem: In thanking you, Excellency, for this interview, I take the liberty, on behalf of those millions of Catholics, of assuring you and His Eminence Cardinal Seper of our most fervent prayers.

Originally published in Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre, Vol. II (1983) by Michael Davies, who later became the second President of FIUV.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Policy Statement on the Official FIUV Logo and the Name Una Voce

http://www.lms.org.uk/photo-files/fiuv-logoThe name of the Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce and its very distinctive logo has been immediately recognisable since its earliest days. Since the year 2,000 and particularly since the promulgation of the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum in 2007, there has been a steady increase in groups being formed and many are using the name Una Voce in their title. A number of these groups have applied for membership of the FIUV and been accepted. But there are others who have taken the name of Una Voce and have not applied, but appear to be claiming a link to the FIUV on their websites. 

 This has become a major cause for concern because they are operating outside the accepted standards of the FIUV yet are being widely regarded as members. In some instances this is affecting the good name of the FIUV.

At its XXth General Assembly, 5th November 2011, Rome, the Federation delegates approved a motion unanimously to protect the FIUV logo and name.

The problem is two-fold:
  1. the official FIUV logo, and
  2. the name Una Voce.
1. THE OFFICIAL FIUV LOGO.

The FIUV logo is an artistic work within the meaning of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. It is an international agreement governing copyright, which was first accepted in Bern, Switzerland in 1886. It is quite clear that the FIUV logo must be classed as an artistic work, commissioned by our founder president Dr Eric de Saventhem, and designed, as it was, by Albert Decaris, the most famous French engraver of the 20th century. It is, therefore, the intellectual property right of the FIUV which has exclusive rights and no one can use it without the express permission of the FIUV.

Statement 1:
(i) The Logo of the Federation shall be the roundel designed by Albert Decaris (1901-1988) with a border in gold containing "Foderatio Internationalis" in black lettering over, and "MCMLXV" in black lettering under, a central black inescutcheon upon which the gold letters "Una Voce" are scattered en sourtout.  The Logo of the Federation shall not be altered, defaced, or used in pretence, nor shall its tincture be modified for any purpose whatsoever.

(ii) The logo of the Federation may be displayed and used by all Members of the Federation upon their official correspondence, publications, and possessions and, with the express permission of the President of the Federation in each case, by all groups having a democratic participation in Members of the Federation.

2. The Name 'Una Voce'.

The name 'Una Voce' was first chosen by Una Voce France in 1965 and it was subsequently adopted by the first six national groups which formed the Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce. The name Una Voce preceded the logo, but both are now inextricably linked as our worldwide identity. It is an identity we must do all in our power to safeguard. 

Statement 2:
The name Una Voce, when used in conjunction with the aims and objectives of the International Federation Una Voce, may not be used or displayed on written, published, or electronic material, by any group which is not democratically associated with the Federation, and where its use may lead to misrepresentation in that the general public is misled into thinking the activity is associated with the International Federation Una Voce

Every effort is made by FIUV to ensure the integrity of its logo and identity in a way that encourages groups that support our aims and groups that aspire to Membership.  However, there are instances where, despite best efforts, groups using the logo and identity of the FIUV refuse to co-operate with the Federation in maintaining that integrity.  In such instances, the FIUV reluctantly has to state publicly that those groups have no connection with the FIUV and use its logo and identity without the consent of the Federation.

If you are aware of a group using the logo or identity of the FIUV inappropriately, or if you are unsure of the status of a group using the logo or the identity of the FIUV, you can assist the Federation by letting us know at: info@fiuv.org.

Leo Darroch,
President - Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce.
2nd October 2012

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Holy Mass in Malta since 1969: a brief history

Since July 2007, slowly but surely, a number of articles in the Maltese media appeared that showed growing intolerance towards the Tridentine Rite. Alas, a number (if not the majority) were penned by well known priests. These articles are continuing to increase, although in a more subtle form. The time has come to set the record straight as many Maltese are still unaware of the developments that are happening in Malta and elsewhere. This is the first article of a series.



In 1969 Pope Paul VI introduced a new rite of the Mass for the Latin Rite Church that was apparently binding on all Catholics – priests, bishops, religious and laypeople. It was then – and is still the case to a great extent in Malta – widely believed that it has been forbidden for a priest to say the Tridentine Mass – unless he had special permission to do so, with a document called an “Indult.”



The introduction of a new rite caused widespread confusion, discouragement, division, disillusionment and destruction – even the closure (or selling) of churches in many countries. This situation did not reach the Maltese shores except for one major common factor with the rest of the Catholic world: more than half of Catholics in Malta have stopped going to Mass altogether since the new rite of Mass was introduced, albeit the introduction of the vernacular was supposed to encourage more participation by the faithful. Not to mention the destruction, in a number of cases, of a number of church furnishings such as altar rails.



A false impression was created throughout almost all the Catholic world by very high Church officials that by virtue of holy obedience all priests after 1969 had to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass according to the Novus Ordo Missae. In Malta, the first people that approached the Archbishop of the time were asked not to pursue matters further because any concessions might lead to schisms.


At the same time, efforts were made by Catholics around the world and, notwithstanding hurdles, a number of milestones were achieved:



a) the so-called Agatha Christie Indult (the permission granted in 1971 by Pope Paul VI for the use of the Tridentine Mass in England and Wales);



b) an attempt by Pope John Paul I, within days after his election, to summon a commission to restore the Tridentine Mass. Unfortunately, John Paul I died before the commission could meet.



c) Quattuor abhunc annos (1984) - this granted an indult for bishops to authorise celebration of the Tridentine Mass according to the 1962 Missal.



d) The first President of FIUV, Dr. Eric de Saventhem was instrumental in convincing Pope John Paul II in 1986 to convoke a special Commission of Cardinals to investigate the situation concerning the celebration of the Tridentine Mass. This Commission consisted of these nine Cardinals: Ratzinger, Mayer, Oddi, Stickler, Casaroli, Gantin, Innocenti, Palazzini and Tomko. It reached the following conclusions:



1) the Tridentine Mass was never forbidden to be said by a Catholic priest in good standing; and furthermore,



2) no one – not even a religious superior, bishop or Cardinal – could forbid a priest from saying the Tridentine Mass.



e) Pope John Paul II's 1988 Ecclesia Dei adflicta established the PCED to address concerns arising from activities of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and his followers and aimed at facilitating a wider access to the Tridentine Mass.


The developments under Pope Benedict XVI have been well documented in this Blog and elsewhere so there is no need to elaborate further here.



Pro Tridentina (Malta) has been in discussion with the Church for a number of years in the hope that the current Pontiff's wishes are adhered to. We are still not yet there but we are moving in the right direction.



Let us pray so that the spiritual as well as temporal benefits of the Tridentine Mass will be available to these islands again, sooner rather than later.




Godwin Xuereb

Thursday, May 19, 2011

FIUV Statement in Response to the Publication of Universae Ecclesiae.




FIUV Statement in Response to the Publication of Universae Ecclesiae.

The publication of the document Universae Ecclesiae on 13th May 2011 has generated much comment and been the subject of detailed analysis in the media. The International Federation Una Voce would like to present a different perspective on this document which it welcomes enthusiastically.

The Una Voce movement started in late 1964, before the end of the Second Vatican Council, to ensure the retention of the age-old Latin language for the celebration of the Holy Mass. National societies were formed and the International Federation Una Voce (FIUV) came into being formally in 1967. In 1970, following the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae, the emphasis had changed and the members of the Una Voce Federation decided to strive for the preservation of the traditional Roman rite as decreed by the Council Fathers in Sacrosanctum Concilium (Art. 4), the document on the liturgy.


In 1970, Dr Eric de Saventhem, the first President of the FIUV, said that the suppression of the
traditional Mass had been achieved de facto only and not de jure. It would be unthinkable, he said, for the older form of Mass to be forbidden as one would have to argue that it had been wrong or bad – either doctrinally or pastorally.


In 1984 the Indult Quattuor Abhunc Annos of Pope John Paul II granted a partial relaxation for the celebration of the traditional Mass which was a small step forward. In 1988 the Indult Ecclesia Dei Adflicta was more generous but the difficulty remained that a bishop’s permission was required and in most instances this was not forthcoming. The situation remained very unsatisfactory – both for priests and laity.


When Pope Benedict XVI was elected in 2005 he asked that people pray for him that he may not flee for fear of the wolves. Notwithstanding the great obstacles being faced, the Holy Father promulgated the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum in July 2007 and affirmed the right of all priests of the Roman rite to celebrate the traditional Latin Mass, thus confirming the position of the Una Voce Federation since 1970 that the traditional Mass may have been suppressed de facto but not de jure. To their shame, some in the Church refused to accept the will of the Holy Father and the legitimate aspirations of many of the faithful and were determined to undermine this Motu Proprio at every opportunity. It was this negative and obstructive stance that made necessary a subsequent document to clarify certain matters.


Although some have commented that Universae Ecclesiae still leaves some questions unclear, what is perfectly clear is that the Holy Father has fully restored to the universal Church the traditional Roman rite as enshrined in the liturgical books of 1962, that the rubrics in force in 1962 must be strictly observed, and that Latin and the Usus Antiquior must be taught in seminaries where there is a pastoral need. And this pastoral need must be determined by those who wish to benefit from Summorum Pontificum and Universae Ecclesiae, and not be decided by those many in authority whose natural desire is to prevent their implementation.


The International Federation Una Voce has worked patiently and tirelessly for the restoration of the traditional liturgy for more than 40 years and is now witnessing a vindication of its fidelity to Holy Mother Church and the See of Peter. The Federation expresses its thanks, prayers, and admiration to our Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, and praises his courage in not fleeing in the face of the wolves.

The Federation also extends its thanks and gratitude to the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, and to those bishops and priests who have also striven, often in great personal difficulty, to preserve and foster the traditional liturgy for this and future generations.

Leo Darroch, President – Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce.
17th May 2011.